Archive for the ‘Online Gambling’ Category

“If You Can’t Trust Banks, Who Can You Trust?”

In a post 9/11 world, “due diligence” is constantly on the forefront—or at least we are expected to believe that. Although banks these days are preaching “due diligence,” it appears that at least one bank does not practice what it preaches. Monterey County Bank, based in Monterey California, http://www.montereycountybank.com that supports several card platforms for businesses providing prepaid debit card products for use on the internet and at atms, has missed the boat on “due diligence,” at the expense of those who entrusted it.

One of those businesses that it sponsors, Digital World Global Card, Inc., http://www.digitalworldcard.com , based out of New York, New York, is owned in full by sole shareholder Joseph Simon LaCroix, aka Joseph Simon, a convicted felon in the province of Ontario, Canada, according to Rowena McDougall, Senior Manager, Public Affairs, for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) .

On October 3, 2005 Joseph LaCroix, the sole officer and director of Digital World Financial, pleaded guilty to the charge of conducting the business of a loan and trust corporation without being registered in the province of Ontario. LaCroix was fined $50,000 and placed on probation for two years. As a condition of the probation LaCroix must pay approximately $2.2 million in restitution to depositors. Good luck on collecting that!

LaCroix also pleaded guilty to carrying on the business of insurance in Ontario without a licence and was fined $5,000. Seems Canada garners favor with criminals, as its criminal penalties certainly don’t seem to discourage crime.

For more on LaCroix’s convictions, see the following:

http://www.claimsurvey.com/english/pubs/news/2005/20051007-digitalworld.asp

http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/english/pubs/news/2005/20051007-digitalworld.asp

http://www.ontarioinsurance.com/english/licensing/ceasedesistorders/cdo-digitalworld.asp

http://www.ontarioinsurance.com/english/pubs/bulletins/mebulletins/2006/g-03_06.asp

http://www.sfsc.gov.sk.ca/ssc/files/enforcementorders/2002_enf/temporary/digitalworldfinancialinc(temp)feb27-02.pdf

http://www.sfsc.gov.sk.ca/ssc/files/enforcementorders/2002_enf/extending/digitalworldfinancialinc(ext)mar13-02.pdf

http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/English/licensing/ceasedesistorders/cdo-digitalworld.asp

Now, less than three years later, LaCroix’s Digital World Global Card, Inc. was shut down on April 1, 2008, by Monterey County Bank after LaCroix has allegedly misappropriated the funds of its many cardholders. Those cardholders had put their trust in Digital World Card, Inc. as well as Monterey County Bank—after all, if you can’t trust a bank, who can you trust? To add insult to injury, LaCroix had his staff to tell cardholders that their accounts were being audited by the bank, implying that they had somehow done something wrong. His staff has since become non-existant. Calls to the company (866) 878-8020 go directly to voice mail, and are not returned. Calls to LaCroix’s cell phone (347) 853-4746 went unanswered.

It should be noted that apparently all of LaCroix’s resellers were left out in the cold. It should also be noted that the ONLY cards affected are those that have the name Digital World Global Card at the top of the card – No others. Funds were sent to Digital World Card, Inc. for the benefit of cardholders, and instead, went to the benefit of LaCroix. In reported cases, LaCroix even emptied funds already on cardholders cards!

LaCroix’s site, Digital World Card, Inc., still maintains its website at http://www.digitalworldcard.com . Do Not Order From This Site! Do not become one of his victims! If the bank backing your prepaid debit card is Monterey County Bank, do your OWN due diligence!

Please remember that Monterey County Bank merely shut his program down on April 1, 2008. They offered absolutely NO COMPENSATION for their cardholders whatsoever. Do you think they would feel the same if you owed them money?

Remember, Buyer Beware!


Online Gambling & Terrorist Financing: America’s New “Poker Threat”

Terrorist DummyOn a darker note, we now learn that the FBI has actually frozen the funds of all US clients, which were still ‘on account’ at NETeller the online e-wallet. It was earlier believed that the digital money would be refunded to US players and now they are calling it evidence and the cash is on ice.

Strangely enough, the authorities are attempting to link NETeller’s online payment processing of gambling money to terrorist funding. Despite the fact that NETeller in the UK has public shareholders, pays dividends and offers 100% audited financial statements, the FBI is pursuing an argument that e-wallet funds are being used to finance terrorist.

Additionally, despite the transparent nature of all these UK payment companies, subpoenas have been issued to the following Wall Street investment banks HSBC, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Kleinwort. All of these fine companies participated in underwriting public offerings for some of the more popular online gambling webs. They all have offices in London and now they all have records being subpoenaed.

This is simply bizarre. Its a great political move because now you have all the other digital currency operators thinking…Am I next?

One notable online gaming expert is quoted as saying:

“(Terrorism is) a smokescreen thrown up by the right-wing Christian lunatics in the government who want to control every facet of human behavior from birth to death. As far as I know, there isn’t a scintilla of evidence there’s any link between online sites and terrorist groups.” *lvbusinesspress.com

Wow, talk about chasing a wild goose! I have not seen anything like this since Roy Cohn and Joe McCarthy crusaded during 1950’s to stop the ‘Red Threat’. Should we start calling this the ‘Poker Threat’ of 2007?

Look closely, the US has gone from Rep. Bob Goodlatte’s (VA) bill, H.R. 4411, which originally got support from the Christian Coalition in an attempt to ban all Internet gambling, up to the present day which is, David Litterick — the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York attempting to connect the dots between online poker money and Osama Bin Laden style funding support. I just don’t see it. The original anti gambling bill was about stopping kids’ access to online gaming. How did they arrive at this new prosecutorial frontier?

Mr. Litterick is one of the finest legal minds in the US and in the past has prosecuted terrorists involved in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and now holds a top position at the Department of Homeland Security.

The significance of Mr. Litterick’s appearance here is quite a shift in politics since August of last year when Rep. Goodlatte had to burn the midnight oil to gain support for his anti gambling bill. With this kind of persecution ahead of them, I don’t think the NETeller execs have a snowballs chance in hell of surviving the case.

This should be a big warning for the gold backed digital currency e-dinar. Formerly operated by the e-gold think tank this electronic money is based on the Islamic Dinar. Operated from Malaysia and Dubai Internet City (a great headquarter for any online business), the primary function of the e-dinar system is to render payments, in gold (e-dinar) and silver (e-dirham), from one customer account to another.

If they are trying to paint ‘poker’ money as terrorist financing, I can’t imagine what they will say about e-dinar. Of course e-dinar is not yet processing 7 billion + each year. Although its a fine digital gold currency, I don’t think it is quite that popular!

This is IMHO a very dark time for the US. Now at the dawn of a new age of ‘electronic money’, short sighted US regulators are taking one step forward and three steps back.

Digitalmoneyworld.com

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Del.icio.us Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Industry in distress: How did it come to this? (online gambling)

Covers.com

By Joe MacDonald, Wed, Jan 31, 2007

On January 16, 2007, the Department of Justice announced that it was charging two founders of Neteller, Stephen Lawrence and John Lefebvre, with laundering billions of dollars of Internet gambling proceeds.

Neteller is a company that was founded in Canada, a sovereign country, in 1999. Neteller later moved to the Isle of Man, and is publicly traded in the United Kingdom. Both are Canadian citizens. These two gentlemen no longer even work for Neteller.

Lawrence and Lefebvre are both charged with conspiring to transfer funds with the intent to promote illegal gambling. If convicted, both defendants face a maximum sentence of 20 years` imprisonment. I am not making this up. That information is all contained in the press release provided by the DOJ.

Twenty years in jail. Twenty years. Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags:

Del.icio.us Tags: , , , ,


Online Ponzi Schemes Using Digital Currency

Charles PonziHYIP: E-gold Ltd. tolerates them or perhaps even loves them because they generate new account holders and fees. Looking at the amount of tiny or small daily spends one may conclude that the HYIP business accounts for a majority of e-gold spends each day. Exchange agents love them and some may say its the life blood of the industry. Without all that buying and selling of DGC, surely exchange agent revenues would dry up.

The HYIP operators love them because the online ponzi schemes keep a strong flow of digital cash coming in each day, week and month. Some forums like talkgold love the HYIPs. Without these schemes, this enormous forum and some others simply would not exist. So why should anyone, especially a non participant, dislike the High Yield Investment Programs?

Some are saying because a non participate does not make income from the investment schemes, they complain about the operations. If your daily income, rent, food and family’s bills are not paid with revenue from the HYIP schemes you should just shut up and let the industry continue as it has for years now. Perhaps they are correct. Others argue that if some HYIP ‘players’ or ‘investors’ are stupid enough to believe they will receive such high returns on their money, they DESERVE to be separated from their cash and no one should try and stop it.

Much of an argument centers around this concept: “If someone is so stupid to participate, they should lose their money.” Is that correct?

HYIP GamingMany online participants will tell you, “But I’ve made money from these (investments)” so why does anyone want to interfere and stop their operation? The same argument could be made for online sports betting which is now taking a beating from the US legal system. People are going to gamble one way or another, why is the US prosecuting these presumed legal foreign systems?

The tough question….each day is money being swindled from unwitting players or is it just how life works, some people will always take advantage of others. Whether its gambling, investments, confidence schemes, if that person is greedy enough someone will eventually take their money it may as well me an HYIP and the industry vendors can make a great living during the process…Who is right?

Who is wrong?

e-gold logoWhy are some operations ‘ethical’ and other not? Why is online horse betting legal and approved but poker is not? People online lose tens of millions each year to these HYIP schemes. Can you ask, “Is the digital currency at fault for allowing their product to be used for such operations?”

Is it all a question of money and the size of the operation. NETeller was processing around 7 billion a year and a majority of those payments were online gambling. 12DailyPro’s bank account transacted over 500 million dollars and Stormpay was reported to have been frozen with about $50 million. Is it OK, to swindle 2-3 million and walk away but the larger players should get busted? Should we allow the small crooks, but prosecute the large ones? Where do you draw the line? Who draws it?

Should a person just shut up and let it go?

I invite your comments. No prior registration is required to comment and all comments appear instantly. Spam will be deleted but all others stay.

DGC wiki link HYIP

What Is An HYIP? Why Should You Avoid Them

Technorati Tags: , ,

Del.icio.us Tags: , , , , , ,


Anti Online Gambling: Feds Play ‘Whack-A-Mole’ With Online Payment Processors

Do you ever feel the whole world is against you?

Have you shouted, “stop the world I want to get off?”

  • July 2006 David Carruthers, chief executive of BetOnSports, the AIM-listed bookmaker, is arrested in Dallas.
  • Sept 2006 Peter Dicks, then Sportingbet chairman, is arrested at JFK airport in New York, on request of Louisiana state authorities.
  • Sept 2006 Manfred Bodner and Norbert Teufelberger, joint chief executives of Bwin, the Austrian internet betting group, are detained in Monaco on charges of violating France’s internet gaming laws.
  • Citadel, INSTAdebit, SolidPay, Moneybookers and several other e-wallets have left the U.S. after NETeller co-founders Stephen Lawrence and John LeFebvre were arrested and charged with money laundering.

How long will this persecution last….not for long! These events just makes my job more interesting….

Online Betting & Digital Currency….”I’m Back Baby!”

With the pull out of NETeller from the US market, many smaller firms are moving to pick up those clients. More and more each day I’m seeing press releases, newsletters and emails like these:

“Curacao (PRWEB) January 20, 2007 In a recent press release, USDBET has added new payment processors known as ‘Make a Deposit,’ and Ewallet Xpress…USDBET also commented that they are adding Click2Pay, and Epassporte shortly.”

“Phil Hellmuth Jr.’s UltimateBet.com (online poker) e-mail newsletter is now encouraging players to use other “safe, secure and similar banking methods already available,” such as ePassporte, ATMonline and CLICK2PAY.”

CashierThe recent flurry of legal activity against online gaming and payment processors has only served to fracture the market. Where one large processor has vanished a dozen smaller ones now are taking its place.

In the coming months, I believe, more brand new offshore payment processors in foreign locations are sure to be popping up.

It is impossible to kill off Internet Gambling. Especially–US players.

Perhaps these recent problems will slow the rapid growth (like we have seen in the past year or two) of online gaming, but ‘online gambling’ is not going away.

In fact, I’ll wager, that the tech savvy youth of today will also soon return with multiple online US betting solutions for home PC users. One possible nightmare scenario could develop if payment processors, casinos and sportsbooks start appearing from all corners of the globe and just as fast vanish a month or two later. Demand for Internet gambling is far too large for US players to just throw in the towel. Especially now, with “SuperBowl Sunday” closing in…greed will find a way.

I have a tremendous amount of respect for the online police, US federal agencies and other law makers that keep the Internet safe, but if they can’t put an end to SPAM, how are they going to stop gambling which is an even bigger money maker? Each day, my email box is full of SPAM and some of them are even casinos, licensed and not licensed. I hate it but what can you do?

Its the same with online gaming and someone has to process those payments.

With this new persecution of online gambling and payment processors, the federal agencies seem to be just playing a big game of ‘whack a mole’. They hit one and another immediately pops up. I think it would have been better just to tax them.

It almost seems that gaming operators had some indication of NETeller’s downfall. Yes, the arrests happened rather suddenly, but most of the industry seems to be taking it in stride just like when PayPal pulled out back in 2001.

For the Internet, the loss of NETeller and the others just seems like a speed bump on the road of life…it won’t stop anythong but it will slow things down. Back-up payment processors were being added to most gaming companies within days of the bad news.

David Stewart, an online gambling expert and lawyer with Washington, D.C.-based firm Ropes & Gray LLP had this to say,

“What you’re finding with the Internet gambling sites is the publicly traded ones and prominent ones are leaving,” and “The entities that are more visible and are more transparent can’t take the heat,” he said. “And all the rest of them are still in the business.”(1)

Many British based gambling operations have withdrawn from the market and we are seeing some consolidation. The following British companies have already withdrawn from the US: PartyGaming PLC, BetOnSports PLC, Sportingbet PLC and even Leisure & Gaming PLC.

However take a closer look and you will find Bodog.com, PokerStars.com and FullTiltPoker.com are still in operating from offshore locations.

DigitalMoneyWorld

(1) Quote from Maderatribune.com

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Del.icio.us Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,