Archive for the ‘Gold and Silver’ Category

“If You Can’t Trust Banks, Who Can You Trust?”

In a post 9/11 world, “due diligence” is constantly on the forefront—or at least we are expected to believe that. Although banks these days are preaching “due diligence,” it appears that at least one bank does not practice what it preaches. Monterey County Bank, based in Monterey California, http://www.montereycountybank.com that supports several card platforms for businesses providing prepaid debit card products for use on the internet and at atms, has missed the boat on “due diligence,” at the expense of those who entrusted it.

One of those businesses that it sponsors, Digital World Global Card, Inc., http://www.digitalworldcard.com , based out of New York, New York, is owned in full by sole shareholder Joseph Simon LaCroix, aka Joseph Simon, a convicted felon in the province of Ontario, Canada, according to Rowena McDougall, Senior Manager, Public Affairs, for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) .

On October 3, 2005 Joseph LaCroix, the sole officer and director of Digital World Financial, pleaded guilty to the charge of conducting the business of a loan and trust corporation without being registered in the province of Ontario. LaCroix was fined $50,000 and placed on probation for two years. As a condition of the probation LaCroix must pay approximately $2.2 million in restitution to depositors. Good luck on collecting that!

LaCroix also pleaded guilty to carrying on the business of insurance in Ontario without a licence and was fined $5,000. Seems Canada garners favor with criminals, as its criminal penalties certainly don’t seem to discourage crime.

For more on LaCroix’s convictions, see the following:

http://www.claimsurvey.com/english/pubs/news/2005/20051007-digitalworld.asp

http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/english/pubs/news/2005/20051007-digitalworld.asp

http://www.ontarioinsurance.com/english/licensing/ceasedesistorders/cdo-digitalworld.asp

http://www.ontarioinsurance.com/english/pubs/bulletins/mebulletins/2006/g-03_06.asp

http://www.sfsc.gov.sk.ca/ssc/files/enforcementorders/2002_enf/temporary/digitalworldfinancialinc(temp)feb27-02.pdf

http://www.sfsc.gov.sk.ca/ssc/files/enforcementorders/2002_enf/extending/digitalworldfinancialinc(ext)mar13-02.pdf

http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/English/licensing/ceasedesistorders/cdo-digitalworld.asp

Now, less than three years later, LaCroix’s Digital World Global Card, Inc. was shut down on April 1, 2008, by Monterey County Bank after LaCroix has allegedly misappropriated the funds of its many cardholders. Those cardholders had put their trust in Digital World Card, Inc. as well as Monterey County Bank—after all, if you can’t trust a bank, who can you trust? To add insult to injury, LaCroix had his staff to tell cardholders that their accounts were being audited by the bank, implying that they had somehow done something wrong. His staff has since become non-existant. Calls to the company (866) 878-8020 go directly to voice mail, and are not returned. Calls to LaCroix’s cell phone (347) 853-4746 went unanswered.

It should be noted that apparently all of LaCroix’s resellers were left out in the cold. It should also be noted that the ONLY cards affected are those that have the name Digital World Global Card at the top of the card – No others. Funds were sent to Digital World Card, Inc. for the benefit of cardholders, and instead, went to the benefit of LaCroix. In reported cases, LaCroix even emptied funds already on cardholders cards!

LaCroix’s site, Digital World Card, Inc., still maintains its website at http://www.digitalworldcard.com . Do Not Order From This Site! Do not become one of his victims! If the bank backing your prepaid debit card is Monterey County Bank, do your OWN due diligence!

Please remember that Monterey County Bank merely shut his program down on April 1, 2008. They offered absolutely NO COMPENSATION for their cardholders whatsoever. Do you think they would feel the same if you owed them money?

Remember, Buyer Beware!


Good News To IGE Cardholders - Thanks To Instant Gold Exchange!

IGECARD.COM, INC. recently learned that its previous debit card supplier would not be replacing its current cardholders IGE Debit Cards with a new card, as originally promised.

IGECARD staff found this completely unsatistactory.  As a result, their staff went to work for a better solution.  And they found it!  Effective immediately, all previous IGE Cardholders qualify for a FREE Replacement of their IGE Card!  With the assistance of Instant Gold Exchange, all previous IGE Cardholders in good standing when the program closed will receive a FREE Digital World Global Debit Card.  The only expense to the Cardholder will be the shipping and handling costs of the card, which is $4.95.  This can be paid via e-gold to account 2125440 (DWG Debit Card).  

Instant Gold Exchange will need the following from the IGE Cardholder: 

Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Date of Birth:
IGE Card #:—XXXXXX (last six digits) 
Send the above information to:  sales@instantgold.net and make the $4.95 payment for S/H and that’s it!  


Gold ETFs Bring Small Everyday Investments In Precious Metal To India

GoldThree mutual funds, Benchmark Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual Fund and Kotak Mutual Funds have filed offer documents for gold ETFs in India. These funds will make it possible for people to invest in gold and allow the purchase of small amounts over a period of time. When they want to sell, they can either receive the actual gold or simply sell the units back into the market. There is just a minimum buy of one gram of the precious metal so anyone can make a investment and plan their future.

Units can be traded like shares of stock and investments can be quickly bought and sold at market price. The new funds will base their prices on the prevailing London Metal Exchange. Any household can buy and sell gold in units for as little as Rs 1,000.

Much like e-gold, GoldMoney and Pecunix the mutual funds work through a third party custodian for storage of the physical gold since fund houses have no practical experience in storing precious metal.

Newkerala.com

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Del.icio.us Tags: , , , , , , , ,


NORFED Dissolved By The Board, “Liberty Services” dba “Liberty Dollar” Emerges

The Liberty Dollar, Accepted Here StickerLike other digital currencies located in the United States which are now under a microscope pending new US laws and regulations…and facing trouble from the US Mint, in early December, NORFED Inc. was dissolved by the Board of Directors. Immediately after, the old company shed its skin and emerged with a new name and ‘tone’.

They have corrected some of the issues which may have originally brought on the allegations from the US Mint. Bernard von NotHaus, the Monetary Architect for the Liberty Dollar explained that, “We simply realized that the Liberty Dollar would succeed easier and faster without any political baggage.”

Von NotHaus vows that this new transition is simply a sign of maturity and the Liberty Dollar will survive and continue to be used across the country and even around the world.

NORFED was originally started in 1998 as a grass roots organization to enlighten people about US Federal Reserve policy and the company called for a repeal of the Federal Reserve’s control over US money. In my opinion that original goal was very successful because during the last number of years in circulation, many US citizens learned about Fed policy, the issuing of money and by offering them the LD, they were then given a choice of methods to pay for their goods and services.

The ‘Liberty Dollar’ was billed as the world’s first ‘free market currency’ and is based on gold and silver backing. In addition to paper bills and gold or silver Liberty Dollars, the eLiberty Dollar was also used online as a digital currency. While not as popular as some of the other precious metal backed digital currencies such as e-gold or Pecunix, many people paid for products online using the eLD, including myself.

One striking difference between the Liberty Dollar and other alternative physical currency backed by silver is a policy used by the company known as the ‘Silver Base’ system. In contrast to the daily spot price of silver which is constantly changing, a one ounce silver Liberty Dollar has a static face value. That face value will always be higher than the spot price because of their ‘Silver Base’ policy.

Pure Silver Liberty Dollar PiecesOriginally that ‘base’ or face value was $10, but since metals have moved up, the ‘Silver Base’ is now $20. There is no randomness to raising the base to a higher price mark and it is a very public set of rules with smart reasoning behind it. However, with the spot price of silver today hovering around $13 USD per ounce, the one ounce silver LD’s face value is still set at $20 and merchants are expected to exchange $20 of goods for that one ounce piece. This is a voluntary transaction between buyer and seller, no one is ever required to use the LD.

Here is an example, if the widget you are selling costs you just $4 USD and you are selling it at $20, with your price mark up — knowing the spot price of silver is about $13 USD you are still in the profit zone. In a case such as this, the merchant is likely to accept Liberty Dollars at face value.

The same idea is used for merchants providing a service such as computer tech. If you are charging $20 and hour, but you know silver is only $13 an ounce spot price, you may be willing to accept LDs if it will mean more business for you or you can then buy other merchandise you need with the $20 face value silver piece. This is the basis of a barter transaction between two individuals. You could stamp $20 on an apple and exchange it for products or services worth $20 if the seller will accept your apples as having a $20 value. After all at today’s prices, the copper value of a US penny is higher than the 1 cent face value, but users still accept it at face value.

The ‘Silver Base’ method also allows the company to sell currency to users and agents at a slight discount which provides an incentive to ’spread the word’. Both users and agents alike can turn a profit by recruiting new merchants or users.

Another physical silver currency used in barter transactions is the Phoenix Dollar. Unlike the Liberty Dollar, each one ounce pure silver disc, is exchanged at that days spot price. There is no set face value so users are exchanging products and goods for exactly the same value of pure silver.

The big difference between the old Liberty Dollar and the LD 2.0 is that the company has dropped the acronym NORFED and the accompanying political rhetoric which called for not only the repeal of the Federal Reserve but also income tax. The LD 2.0 is politically neutral, low key, referred to as a ‘Private barter monetary system’ and carries the slogan “Protecting and growing your money - one Liberty Dollar at a time”. This upgraded version is being marketed to businesses as a ‘private barter currency’ which is not only ‘good for the community but it also can be profitable for users’. The company is making every attempt to insure that their new barter currency will NOT be mistaken as any part of the US Mint or the US government monetary system.

Despite the very public warnings from the US, Mint von NotHaus remains adamant in his claims that the old version and the new version are both legal private currency. He reinforces his opinion further by quoting Andrew Williams, spokesman for the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, DC, who said, “There is no law that says goods and services must be paid for with Federal Reserve notes. Parties entering into a transaction can establish any medium of exchange that is agreed upon.”

Worldwide LDs? Yes…
Bernard has also created LDs for Puerto Rico, Panama, and Ecuador. The one ounce Silver Libertys available in these regions carry the new LIBERTAD obverse with the 2007 date and CONFIE EN DIOS for Trust in God. No comments yet from any of these governments but Pure Silver as a currency should be well accepted in these areas.

For further info on the ‘new’ Liberty Dollar 2.0, please contact a Regional Currency Office nearest you. Find one here: http://www.libertydollar.org/ld/rco/rco-find.htm or call 888.LIB.DOLLAR (888-421-6181).

There are an estimated $20 million dollars of LDs currently in circulation.

Technorati Tags: ,


E-gold Article From Wired.com

Here is the complete article from : Wired.com

E-Gold Gets Tough on Crime

By Kim Zetter| Also by this reporter
02:00 AM Dec, 11, 2006

The founder of PayPal competitor e-gold has grown tired of the government characterizing his business as a haven for money launderers, terrorists, child pornographers and credit card thieves.So a year after the Department of Justice raided his offices, Douglas Jackson, president of Gold and Silver Reserve, which operates e-gold, has been wading deep into his customer transaction logs to identify and fight back against people who misuse his system. In the last month, he’s blocked about 2,000 accounts from his system, and he’s voluntarily turned over detailed account and transaction histories to federal law enforcement.In the process, Jackson says he’s exposed an illicit and previously invisible economic underground.”It’s like discovering an undisturbed tomb in Egypt where you’ve got this archaeological thing,” Jackson says about the wealth of data he’s uncovered. “There will never be another crack like this one where all of these people have left their footprints with memos that sometimes give us clues as to what they’re doing.”E-gold is a privately issued digital currency backed by real gold and silver stored in banks in Europe and Dubai. Jackson says about 1,000 new e-gold accounts are opened daily, and the system processes between 50,000 and 100,000 transactions a day.

With a value independent of any national legal tender, the electronic cash has cultivated a libertarian image over the years, while drawing the ire of law enforcement agencies who frequently condemn it publicly as an anonymous, untraceable criminal haven, inaccessible to police scrutiny.

Jackson says the image is false. Although a user can open an account using a fraudulent name and a proxy server that shields his or her IP address, a permanent record of every transaction remains in the e-gold system, which can help law enforcement agencies track criminals.

Jackson says he first became aware that credit card thieves were laundering money through e-gold from 2004 news stories about a Secret Service bust of Shadowcrew, a website where carders congregated. He contacted the Secret Service and pleaded with them to work with him to catch the carders, but the agency inexplicably rebuffed him.

Last December, the Department of Justice raided the Melbourne, Florida, office of Gold and Silver Reserve, and seized more than 100 boxes of paper records in a move dubbed Operation Goldwire.

“They basically raped our computers and also took us offline for 36 hours, took all the paper out of our office,” Jackson says. The government also froze Gold and Silver’s U.S. bank account. The company survived, Jackson says, only because its euro, pound and yen accounts are maintained outside the United States.

Jackson says the criminal affidavit, filed under seal, accused Gold and Silver of aiding terrorists and child pornographers. But prosecutors later dropped the criminal claim, replacing it with a civil complaint charging Gold and Silver with operating as an unlicensed money-transmitting business. Jackson’s lawyers say the charge is bogus because Gold and Silver isn’t a money transmitter, since the company doesn’t accept cash from customers, only wire transfers. That case is on hold until April, and a Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the suit.

Rather than attack him, Justice officials and the Secret Service should have been working with him, says Jackson. Because all the while they were trying to build a case against e-gold, he was gathering evidence that could help them battle the real criminals.

Around the time of the Shadowcrew bust, Jackson’s staff developed a method for doing global searches in e-gold transactions. So Jackson decided to see if he could find carders in his system by searching the “memo” field, where — like the memo line on a check — the sender can note the reason for the transaction. Jackson says some carders, apparently so convinced of their invisibility, don’t try to hide the nature of their activity.

He searched keywords from news articles about carders, such as “cvv,” “dumps” and “cob.” The first two terms refer to data encoded on the magnetic stripe of credit cards; the last one stands for “change of billing,” referring to credit card accounts for which a crook has changed the billing address to a mail drop under his control.

Jackson also searched the online nicknames of specific carders that law enforcement agents mentioned in news reports or at a cybercrime conference Jackson attended: names like Zoomer, Kayser Sose, Smash, Segvec, Jilsi, Ragoo and John Dillinger, a carder who described his crimes for Wired News earlier this year and who recently signed a plea agreement to cooperate with authorities.

Jackson says some culprits that authorities deemed “unfindable” were easy to track through e-gold. One appeared to be a high school kid in Louisville, Ohio, judging from information gleaned from his transactions. Jackson tracked two others to Egypt after one of them converted e-gold to cash and had an intermediary load it onto a debit card sent to him by courier.

Jackson identified a core group of accounts that appeared to involve carding, and made lists of accounts that exchanged e-gold with them. Patterns emerged. Beginning earlier this year, for example, one account-holder in New York purchased postal orders worth about $6,000 twice a month from three different post offices, exchanged them for e-gold and transferred the funds to an account-holder in the Ukraine. Altogether he purchased about 30 postal orders totaling more than $150,000.

In other accounts he found a $17,000 transaction supposedly “for beer” and $10,000 for Louis Vuitton purses. Over two weeks last February, one account-holder moved $29,000 worth of e-gold to purchase Sony Vaio computers, followed two days later by $30,000 for more Sony Vaios, and $40,000 four days after that. The recipient of the funds accumulated more than $900,000 in e-gold over a brief period of time, more than half of which remained parked in his account.

The timing of the transactions, last spring, corresponded with news articles reporting a serious wave of debit card breaches across the country that caused several banks to reissue compromised cards.

By matching other data, like time stamps, IP addresses and hashes of passwords, Jackson could sometimes identify when one person controlled or used different accounts. “The good ones will have a different IP address every time they touch the internet,” he says. “But every once in a while you get one of these bad guys on one of these accounts where … he may use a fixed IP.”

Jackson decided that law enforcement needed to know about what he’d found.

He’d received and complied with hundreds of subpoenas in the past — from FBI, Secret Service, Drug Enforcement Agency and international law enforcement agencies. But this time he had trouble finding someone to work with him. Since the Secret Service had already dismissed him, he approached the FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service, but got the runaround. Jackson said one agency wanted his company to sign an agreement stating he wouldn’t be immune from prosecution if authorities, in the process of obtaining information from him, found something that could incriminate e-gold.

He refused to sign, but began assisting postal inspectors and other agents voluntarily.

Jackson acknowledges some discomfort over the decision to give information to the feds without legal process — a move that could save e-gold from further law enforcement aggression, while tarnishing its libertarian sheen.

His lawyers aren’t bothered by the move, however. They say agents repeatedly promised to provide Jackson with court orders since last February but have not come through.”You have a very strong documented relationship with these agents asking about particular people with the promise that they are going to be subpoenaing,” says Jackson attorney Andrew Ittleman. “Just because they never ultimately gave him a subpoena doesn’t put the fault on Jackson — it’s on the agents. He was acting in good faith.”His lawyers also say that once the company discovered evidence of possible wrongdoing, it had no choice but to hand over information to the government. Jackson could even have been charged with aiding and abetting money launderers under federal statutes if he didn’t report the suspicious activity.”E-gold, because of the way in which it operates, creates the potential for a misuse,” says lead attorney Mitchell Fuerst. “And to the extent that that can happen, I think the company has an ethical and a legal obligation to prevent those crimes from being committed.”But the company thinks it’s unlikely that anyone involved in illicit activity would sue e-gold for blocking their account or giving their data to law enforcement.

Kevin Bankston, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says e-gold is violating its privacy policy, which states that the company won’t hand over data except under court order. Its actions “could open it to liability under contract violation and false advertising and unfair competition claims,” he says.

In November, Jackson began running an automated script to blacklist accounts he identified as suspicious. The digital funds aren’t frozen, and the account holder can conceivably get the money out by transferring it to another account he controls, or to a different e-gold customer. But then those accounts get blocked, too.

“We’re looking to make these people into vagabond zombies,” he says. “They can log into the account and send payment to someone who’s willing to accept payment from them, but at that other person’s risk.”

But the aggressive policing is chafing some users, who say they did nothing wrong and were improperly banned.

Cesar Carranza runs a business called uBuyWeRush selling liquidation and overstock merchandise online and from three California stores. He uses e-gold for some overseas customers because, unlike credit card and PayPal transactions, e-gold purchases are irreversible and there are no charge-backs to the merchant.

“I am a reputable merchant,” he says. “I am not a con artist or a thief.”

Carranza was arrested in 2004 but never charged with anything. At the time, he was selling MSR-206s through eBay — devices used to encode data on the magnetic strip of credit cards. It’s not illegal to sell them, but carders often use them to code stolen credit and debit card numbers onto blank cards. Carranza says police accused him of selling merchandise to terrorists. He’s since sold the MSR part of his business.

Last month, e-gold blocked two of his accounts containing about $19,000, providing little information about why. Carranza says the block hasn’t hurt his business but he’ll never use e-gold again and is considering legal action to get his funds. “I no longer trust the e-gold integrity,” he says.